HomeAbout UsServices
Business Services Personal Services
Our People SeminarsCareersContact Us


Family Violence: New Amendments to the Family Law Act

Written on the 25th of June 2012 by Alan Wright

Important amendments to the Family Law Act relating to family violence came into effect on 7 June 2012... 

Family violence and abuse have always been very important issues in parenting cases in the Family Court and Federal Magistrates Court.

Important amendments to the Family Law Act 1975 ("the Act"), specifically relating to Family Violence, came into effect on 7 June 2012.  This article is designed to offer readers an overview of the amendments related to Family Violence Law.

The Act states that in making a parenting order a court "must regard the best interests of the child as the paramount consideration". For some time the Family Law Act Australia has stated that there are two primary considerations in determining what is in the child's best interests (there are further considerations called "additional considerations").  The two primary considerations are:

  1. the benefit to the child of having a meaningful relationship with both of the child's parents; and
  2. the need to protect the child from physical or psychological harm from being subjected to, or exposed to, abuse, neglect or family violence.

Following the amendments the Act now specifies that the court must give greater weight to the second of these considerations.

Some of the additional considerations have also been amended.  For example, the subsection has been deleted that said that the court was to consider "the willingness and ability of each of the child's parents to facilitate, and encourage, a close and continuing relationship between the child and the other parent".  It would not be appropriate for a decision to be made against a parent who was not being "friendly" if their actions were based on the need to protect the child from harm, abuse, neglect or family violence.

The definitions of "abuse" and "family violence" have been expanded.

The following matters have been added to the definition of abuse:

  1. "causing the child to suffer serious psychological harm, including (but not limited to) when that harm is caused by the child being subjected to, or exposed to, family violence";
  2. "serious neglect of the child".

Family Law Act - Turnbull Hill Lawyers in NewcastleThe definition of family violence is significantly expanded and now sets out examples of behaviour which may constitute family violence including:

  1. Assault.
  2. Sexual assault.
  3. Stalking.
  4. Repeated derogatory taunts.
  5. Intentionally damaging or destroying property.
  6. Unreasonably denying the family member the financial autonomy that he/she would otherwise have had.
  7. Unreasonably withholding financial support needed to meet the reasonable living expenses of the family member or his/her child, at a time when the family member is entirely or predominantly dependent on the person for financial support.

Other changes to the Act include:

  1. Parties to court cases are now required to notify the court of any child protection matters, including any notifications that have been made or investigations underway.
  2. Previously if the court found that a party had made a false allegation or statement in the proceedings then the court was required to order that the party pay some or all of the costs of the other party.  That mandatory requirement has been removed.
  3. A new subsection to provide that an object of the Act is to give effect to the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child.  It will be interesting to see what effect, if any, this has on parenting cases.

The changes to Family Violence Law apply to cases filed on or after 7 June 2012.  The existing law applies to cases filed before then.

If you have any questions about the Family Law Act or an issue related to Family Violence, please do not hesitate to call our Family Law and De Facto Law Team on 1800 994 279 or email us. A member of our team will endeavour to respond to your enquiry within 24 hours.

- Alan Wright


Author: Alan Wright
Publications

Employment

The FWC clarifies the meaning of "Casual Employment" and "Casual Employee"

At long last some much needed clarity around the meaning of "casual employment". During my 22 years working in the law, employers have always been at risk of an employee, whom they had engaged and paid as a casual, maintaining at some later time that they were actually a permanent employee under the common law...and therefore...

Read More ...

Workplace Bullying: The new proposed laws and what they could mean for employers...

Workplace bullying and harassment is a serious issue impacting many businesses across Australia and it’s been on the rise over the last few years. A study of adult workers in 2010 by the Workplace Bullying Institute (WBI) found that 35 per cent had suffered from some form of bullying in the workplace, in the form of being verbally...

Read More ...

The Unfair Dismissal High Income Threshold Explained

The high income threshold for unfair dismissals refers to the highest possible income an employee can have, unless they are covered by an award or enterprise agreement, before they are excluded from making an unfair dismissal claim against their organisation. This threshold applies under the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) and changes every year on...

Read More ...

Workplace Investigations: Internal Vs External

Workplace Investigations typically take place following one or more employees acting inappropriately, and they are becoming an increasingly challenging and time consuming problem for employers to deal with. The type of investigation, and the resources the employer allocates to resolving the issue, depends on the seriousness of the behaviour...

Read More ...

Changes to unfair dismissal laws in 2013

The time for lodging an Unfair Dismissal Claim or a General Protections Claim is now the same, 21 days...and this should result in all the issues in dispute between an employee and employer being resolved in a timelier manner Prior to the start of this Year, an employee who thought he/she had been unfairly dismissed had 14 days from the...

Read More ...

| 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 | Next


Articles via RSS rss
Events
Blogs
"Thank you Natalie and Jill for great,...

Gina H

Home Bookmark Site Print Tell a Friend Contact UsBook your appointment Now!! Call us Now!!