Fairness and equality in your Will requires a lot of thought and a well crafted document

Written on the 21 May 2010 by Warwick Gilbertson

Following is an example of how a commonly used term in a Will which on the face of it appears fair, can actually result in very unfair consequences.

Patrick and Jane are in their early fifties and have three children aged 26, 21 and 13. They have a Will which makes equal provision for the three children.

The eldest child Charles is a qualified accountant. He has just graduated from university. He is in full-time employment earning $50,000.00 per year.

The middle child Anne is a second year university student and has two years to complete her economics degree.

The youngest child Clare has just commenced high school. She has six years of high school to complete. It is then anticipated that she will go to university.

Patrick and Jane attend a solicitor to check their affairs are in order. The solicitor asks questions about their personal life and their children. "We have a Will. Everything is divided equally." The solicitor looks at them and asks, "Is that fair?" . This was an unexpected question. Nobody had asked a question like that before. "Of course it's fair Isn't it? " The effect of the existing Wills was then carefully examined.

If Patrick and Jane were killed in a motor vehicle accident today, Charles and Anne have had the benefit of their parents' full support during their high school education. Clare would not have the benefit of that support.

Anne currently works part time for a bank and her income is supplemented by her parents. (The parents pay for incidentals which she cannot afford such as car repairs, clothing, holidays, small luxuries and food from time to time). Anne is "semi dependent" on her parents. Charles has already received this support and benefit from his parents and is independent.

Clare, on the other hand, is still totally dependent on her parents. After their death she will not have the support of her parents during her high school years that Charles and Anne did.
Neither will Clare have the support of her parents when she is at university that Charles had and Anne has had to date. Clare will have to provide for herself. That provision will come from her share of her parents' estate.

Working out the dollar value of the benefits received by Charles and Anne during the time they were fully dependent and semi dependent shocks Patrick and Jane.
"Shouldn't Anne continue to receive supplementary support from the estate until she finishes her university degree? Shouldn't Clare receive full support until she completes her high school and supplementary support during her years at university?"

The only available means to provide this support is from the estate. The current Wills of Patrick and Jane do not address this inequality although they appear to be "fair". Charles has been treated in a financially superior fashion to Anne. Anne and Charles have received benefits far in excess of the benefits given to Clare. "In this example, "I give the whole of my estate to be divided equally" is not equal at all.

If Patrick and Jane wish to achieve equality and fairness in their Wills, they need to spend more time properly considering what are fair gifts to their children having regard to all the prevailing circumstances, and then have Wills crafted in such a way that their wish will be achieved.

We hope this has been of interest and if you have any questions, please call on 02 4904 8000 or email Warwick Gilbertson (Specialising in Estate Planning).


If you have any further questions about this topic or you'd like to discuss a related matter, please do not hesitate to call us on 1800 994 279 or email us. A member of our Wills & Estates team will endeavour to respond to your enquiry within 24 hours.

- Warwick Gilbertson
Partner, Wills & Estates Lawyer

Warwick Gilbertson - Wills & Estates Lawyer

Will Disputes in NSW


Author: Warwick Gilbertson

Contact Us Now

We respond in 24 hours or less

Please provide details regarding your matter so we can assist you

Enquiry Form

Fill out our enquiry form and we'll respond within 24 hours

Listen to the captcha
 
Publications

Can you terminate an employee for being overweight?

Employees must be able to safely and competently perform the duties related to their role. If an employee becomes unable to do so, can the employer terminate them? This was tested in Court when an ex-employee lodged an unfair dismissal application against his old employer alleging it was unfair for the employer to terminate his employment due...

Read More ...

How to get the property you want in a hot property market

When you find the residential property you want to buy, you'll most likely want to make sure that the seller does not "gazump" you that is, you'll want to make sure the seller does not sell the property to another competing purchaser. When buying a residential property, the best way to avoid being "gazumped" is...

Read More ...

Loans to Children - The riskiest loans of all?

We all love our children and want to give them all we possibly can, including providing loans to assist them financially. Loans to children are often unsecured, informal and rely on the trust and relationship between the parent and child and sometimes that child's partner. What is often not considered is the risk of lending money to a chi...

Read More ...

Travelling over the holidays? Remember to ensure your Estate Planning documents are in order

Are you travelling during the holiday period?  Do you have Power of Attorney and Enduring Guardianship documents in place, as well as your Will? Christmas and the holidays come with much excitement. Families often take the opportunity to catch up with relatives, and travel. The approach of Christmas is also a reminder that the ye...

Read More ...

P2 license holders can no longer use mobile phones under any circumstances while driving

All mobile phone use is now banned for Learner, P1 drivers and provisional motorcycle riders, this applies to all use, including hands-free sets and phones set to speakers, Bluetooth or an automated audio device while driving or when stationary but not parked. The penalty that applies is 4 demerit points and a fine of up to $2,200. Double...

Read More ...

| 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 | Next


Events
Blogs
"John (Teague), thanks for your efforts. I am pl...

Dave W

Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation

enquiries@turnbullhill.com.au