|
Accountancy Firm Slugged Over $26,000 for Unlawful TerminationWritten on the 5th of September 2012 by Andrew Bull ![]() Unlawful TerminationThe Federal Magistrates Court has ruled that an accountancy firm breached various sections of the Fair Work Act 2009 when it dismissed a 68 year old accountant due to his physical disability. In this case, the Employee had been employed by the firm for over 5 years when he developed a heart condition requiring him to undergo surgery. Following the surgery, the Employee could not attend work for just over 3 months, when he finally received a doctor’s clearance to return to work. Upon advising the Employer of his doctor’s clearance the Employee was advised verbally that there was no longer a job for him. Around 4 weeks later the Employee was provided with a written notice of termination that stated the termination was due to, “…economic circumstances and health related issues”. The Employee commenced unlawful termination proceedings, claiming the Employer contravened the “General Protections” provisions of the Act that prevent an employer from taking adverse action against an employee for a discriminatory reason.
The Employee also claimed that he did not receive notice of termination entitlements as required by the National Employment Standards. The Employer argued that the Employee received the proper notice because the notice period commenced when the employee was verbally advised of the termination of his employment. However the Act requires an employer to provide written notice of termination to an employee, and consequently the Court ruled that the notice period did not commence until the date that the written notice was given to the Employee, some 4 weeks after the Employee received verbal notice. This resulted in the Employee not receiving his proper notice period entitlement of 5 week’s pay, and that also caused the Employer to contravene the NES. The Court ordered the Employer to pay penalties, compensation and interest of over $26,000. What Employers need to do in order to avoid Unlawful TerminationIn summary, when terminating a person’s employment, this case reinforces the need for employers to:
a) have a valid reason for termination;
Author: Andrew Bull
Other Recent ArticlesThe Statutory Warranties Available Under The Home Building Act, 1989Completing the Financial Statement The FWC clarifies the meaning of "Casual Employment" and "Casual Employee" Swimming Pool owners must register their Swimming Pool by 29th October 2013... Estate Planning and Enduring Powers of Attorney: what can your attorney really do? |
|